1.







2.




3.



4.




5.







6.







7.

Рузакова О., Колчун К. Часть четвертая Гражданского кодекса РФ: отдельные проблемы правового регулирования // Интеллектуальная собственность. Авторское право и смежные права. – 2006. – № 11. – С.4-15.

Хохлов В.А. О проекте Четвертой части Гражданского кодекса РФ: есть ли варианты? // Закон. – 2006. – № 12. – С. 73-78.

Маковский А.Л. Варианты просят не предлагать // Закон. – 2007. – № 1. – С. 107-111.

Dessemontet F. La propriete intellectuelle.- Lausanne: Centre du droit de l’entreprise de l’Universite de Lausanne, 2000.

Directive 98/44/EC of 6 July 1998 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions // Official Journal of the European Communities. – L. 213. –1998. – 30 July. – P. 13.

Sterckx S. Some Ethically Problematic Aspects of the Proposal for a Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions // European Intellectual Property Review. – 1998. – № 4. – Р. 123-128.

Nott R. “You Did It”: The European Biotechnology Directive At Last // European Intellectual Property Review. – 1998. – Vol. 20. – № 9.

8.










9.




10.






11.





12.



13.




14.

Harmonization of Industrial Property and Copyright Law in the European Community: Report of a Symposium held by the Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright and Competition Law, at Ringberg Castle near Tegernsee // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law. – 1987. – № 3. – Vol. 18. – Р. 303-337.

Jones N. The New Draft Biotechnology Directive // European Intellectual Property Review. – 1996. – № 6. – Р. 36-365.

Graaf van de E.S. Patent Law and Modern Biotechnology: A Comparative Study about the Requirements and the Scope of Protection.- Sanders Institute; Gouda Quint, 1997.

Galloux J.-Ch. La protection juridique de la matiere biologique en droit francais // Revue internationale de droit compare. – 1998. – № 2. – Р. 491-512.

Govaere I. The Use and Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights in EC Law. – London, 1996.

Drahos P. Biotechnology Patents, Markets and Morality // European Intellectual Property Review. – 1999. – Vol. 21. – № 9. – Р. 441-449.

Industrial Property Under The Trips Agreement: Paper Prepared by the International Bureau of WIPO (WIPO/PLT/MOW/99/12) // WIPO Regional Seminar on Teaching Intellectual Property Law, Organized by WIPO, ROSPATENT and TMAU (Moscow, March 29 to 31, 1999).

15.



16.




17.




18.





19.






20.




21.





22.

Т 356/93, PLANT GENETIC SYSTEMS / Glutamine sythetase inhibitors [1995] E.P.O.R. 357.

Black J. Regulation as Facilitation: Negotiating the Genetic Revolution // The Modern Law Review. – 1998. – Vol. 61. – № 5. – Р. 621-660.

Pottage A. The Inscription of Life: Genes, Patents, and Bio-politics // The Modern Law Review. – 1998. – Vol. 61. – № 5. – Р. 740-765.

Peace N., Christie A. Intellectual Property Protection for the Products of Animal Breeding // European Intellectual Property Review. – 1996. – № 4. – Р. 213-233.

Lewelyn M. The Patentability of Biological Material: Continuing Contradiction and Confusion // European Intellectual Property Review. – 2000. – Vol. 22. – № 5. – Р. 191-197.

Scott A. The Dutch Challenge to the Bio-Patenting Directive // European Intellectual Property Review. – 1999. – № 4. – P. 212-215.

Ford R. The Morality of Biotech Patents: Differing Legal Obligations in Europe // European Intellectual Property Review. – 1997. – № 6. – Р. 315-318.

Hellstadius A., Meier-Ewert W. Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Intellectual Property Matters – Perspectives for the Future (EU and World-Wide) // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law. – 2005. – № 3. – Р. 313-335.